President Donald Trump lashed out at his own Justice Department Monday for seeking the Supreme Courtâs backing for a âwatered down, politically correct versionâ of the travel ban he signed in March instead of a broader directive that was also blocked by the courts.
In a series of early morning tweets, Trump urged the Justice Department to ask for an âexpedited hearingâ at the high court and seek a âmuch tougher versionâ of the order temporarily blocking entry to the U.S. from a half-dozen majority Muslim countries. He called the courts, which have blocked both versions of the travel ban, âslow and political.â
Itâs unclear whether the president has conveyed his requests to the Justice Department, which he oversees, in a forum other than Twitter. The White House did not immediately respond to requests for that information.
The president has renewed his push for the travel ban in the wake of the vehicle and knife attack in London that left seven people dead and dozens injured. The Islamic State has claimed responsibility for the attack.
Trump also stressed that his proposal was a âtravel ban,â a description his aides have disputed in the past. He said on Twitter:
“People, the lawyers and the courts can call it whatever they want, but I am calling it what we need and what it is, a TRAVEL BAN!”
He also tweeted “The Justice Dept. should have stayed with the original Travel Ban, not the watered down, politically correct version they submitted to S.C.”
“The Justice Dept. should ask for an expedited hearing of the watered down Travel Ban before the Supreme Court – & seek much tougher version!”
“In any event we are EXTREME VETTING people coming into the U.S. in order to help keep our country safe. The courts are slow and political!”
The president spent much of the weekend responding to the attack on Twitter. In one instance, he leveled an inaccurate criticism of London Mayor Sadiq Khan, saying the mayor was telling people there was âno reason to be alarmedâ about the attack. The mayor had instead been telling London residents not to be concerned by a stepped-up police presence in the city following the attack.
âNo reason to be alarmed,â Khan said, describing a more visible presence as âone of things the police and all of us need to do to make sure we are as safe as we possibly can be.â
Later, the mayorâs spokesman said he was too busy to respond to Trumpâs âill-informedâ tweet.
Trump also addressed the London attack Sunday night at the conclusion of a fundraiser for Fordâs Theater, scene of one of the most famous acts of bloodshed in American history: the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln.
âAmerica sends our thoughts and prayers and our deepest sympathies to the victims of this evil slaughter and we renew our resolve, stronger than ever before, to protect the United States and its allies from a vile enemy that has waged war on innocent life, and itâs gone on too long,â Trump said.
Senior White House adviser Kellyanne Conway on Monday condemned what she called the mediaâs âobsession with covering everything he says on Twitter and very little of what he does as president.â
In an appearance on NBCâs âToday Show,â Conway said people should pay attention to what the president is doing, saying people in England had tried to inform authorities about the terrorists before the attacks happened.
âIf youâre going to see something and say something, it has to be followed by, do something,â she said. âAnd this president is trying to do something to protect the people of this country.â
Trump said he had spoken with British Prime Minister Theresa May to express Americaâs âunwavering supportâ and offer U.S. assistance as the British government works to protect its citizens and bring the guilty to justice.
British authorities say that have identified the three attackers but have not revealed that information publicly.
Trump has used attacks around the world to justify his pursuit of the travel and immigration ban, one of his first acts since taking office. The first order, which was signed at the end of his first week in office, was hastily unveiled without significant input from top Trump national security advisers or the agencies tasked with implementing the order.
After that order was struck down by the courts, the administration decided to write a second directive rather than appeal the initial ban to the Supreme Court. The narrower order temporarily halts entry to the U.S. from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen is necessary to protect U.S. national security.
Iraq was removed from the list of banned countries in the second order and an indefinite halt to entry from Syrian refugees was replaced by a temporary pause. Still, the courts have also blocked that directive.
Last week, the Justice Department formally asked the Supreme Court to let a ban be put in place. The high court also is being asked to uphold the constitutionality of the Trump travel policy, which lower courts have blocked because it shows anti-Muslim prejudice.
A date for the court to hear arguments in the case was not immediately set.
Source: fox59.comÂ
Be the first to comment