A human rights lawyer who brought abuse claims against UK troops after the Iraq War has been struck off for misconduct.\u00a0 Phil Shiner, from the now-defunct law firm Public Interest Lawyers, had 12 charges of misconduct proved against him by a panel of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal.\u00a0 He had admitted acting recklessly by publicly claiming UK troops unlawfully killed, tortured and mistreated Iraqis.<\/p>\n
The defence secretary said Mr Shiner had “made soldiers’ lives a misery”.<\/p>\n
Sir Michael Fallon told the BBC he was “delighted” that Mr Shiner had been “exposed”.<\/p>\n
“The decent thing for him to do now would be to apologise,” he said.<\/p>\n
In five of the charges found proved he was found to have acted dishonestly, including agreeing to pay “sweeteners” to a fixer – named only as “Z” in tribunal papers but understood to be called Abu Jamal – to persuade him to change his evidence to the \u00a331m Al-Sweady Inquiry.\u00a0 The five-year investigation ruled in 2014<\/a> that allegations of murder and torture made against British soldiers by Iraqi detainees were “deliberate lies”.\u00a0 Mr Shiner previously admitted nine allegations of acting without integrity, including that he had made unsolicited approaches to potential clients.<\/p>\n He did not attend the hearing, having written to the tribunal to say he was unwell and could not afford to pay for a defence lawyer.<\/p>\n The tribunal heard in December that he accepted he would be struck off as a result of the case, thought to be one of the most expensive ever brought by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).\u00a0 Andrew Tabachnik, representing the SRA, accused Mr Shiner of being “in a state of avoidance” to prevent proceedings from going ahead in full. The hearing finished earlier than expected as a result of Mr Shiner’s absence.<\/p>\n The tribunal heard about how British military personnel had been affected by his actions in “cold-calling” the family members of alleged Iraqi victims.\u00a0 Army Colonel James Coote, who was a major stationed in Basra, said the false claims made against British troops at the Battle of Danny Boy in 2004 had been “extremely stressful and demoralising”.<\/p>\n As a team leader at PIL, Mr Shiner authorised and procured payments and fee-sharing agreements with the agent, “Z”, between 2007 and 2010.<\/p>\n The tribunal also ordered Mr Shiner to pay interim costs of \u00a3250,000.<\/p>\n A second solicitor from PIL, John Dickinson, was reprimanded by the tribunal and ordered to pay \u00a32,000 costs after he admitted that failed he to keep Al-Sweady clients properly informed about the progress of the inquiry.<\/p>\n SRA chief executive Paul Philip said he welcomed the tribunal’s decision to strike off Mr Shiner.<\/p>\n “It is important that solicitors can bring forward difficult cases, but the public must be able to place their trust in them,” he said.<\/p>\n “His misconduct has caused real distress to soldiers, their families and to the families of Iraqi people who thought that their loved ones had been murdered or tortured.<\/p>\n “More than \u00a330m of public funds were spent on investigating what proved to be false and dishonest allegations.”<\/p>\n The tribunal aims to publish its decision within seven weeks, after which Mr Shiner would have 21 days to appeal.<\/p>\n Sir Michael said in a statement: “Justice has finally been served after we took the unprecedented step of submitting evidence on his abuse of our legal system.<\/p>\n “Phil Shiner made soldiers’ lives a misery by pursuing false claims of torture and murder – now he should apologise.<\/p>\n “We will study any implications for outstanding legal claims closely.”<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Source\u00a0 http:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/news\/uk-38841544<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"‘State of avoidance’<\/h2>\n