{"id":5226,"date":"2017-01-22T07:11:00","date_gmt":"2017-01-22T12:11:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/?p=5226"},"modified":"2017-01-22T07:11:00","modified_gmt":"2017-01-22T12:11:00","slug":"uk-judges-change-court-rules-child-contact-violent-fathers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/2017\/01\/22\/uk-judges-change-court-rules-child-contact-violent-fathers\/","title":{"rendered":"UK judges change court rules on child contact for violent fathers"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"content__article-body from-content-api js-article__body\" data-test-id=\"article-review-body\">\n<p>Senior judges are taking steps to end the presumption that a father must have contact with a child where there is evidence of domestic abuse that would put the child or mother at risk. The reforms are to be introduced in the family courts after campaigning by the charity Women\u2019s Aid, which identified that 19 children have been killed in the last 10 years by their violent fathers after being given contact with them by judges.\u00a0 The changes include a demand from one of the most senior family court judges for all the judiciary to have further training on domestic violence and to act to ensure women and children are protected.<\/p>\n<p>Mr Justice Cobb announced the changes on Friday after talks with Women\u2019s Aid, and following <a class=\"u-underline\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/society\/2016\/dec\/22\/revealed-how-family-courts-allow-abusers-to-torment-their-victims\" data-link-name=\"in body link\">concerns raised in a Guardian investigation<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Since its report on the child murders last year, Women\u2019s Aid has identified another case in which a child was murdered by a father after being given contact via the family court. The charity is presenting their updated report to the prime minister in Downing Street on Monday.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"element element-rich-link element--thumbnail element-rich-link--upgraded\" data-component=\"rich-link\" data-link-name=\"rich-link-1 | 1\">\n<div class=\"rich-link tone-news--item \">\n<div class=\"rich-link__container\">\n<div class=\"rich-link__read-more\">\n<div class=\"rich-link__arrow\">Cobb also called for an <a class=\"u-underline\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/society\/2016\/dec\/30\/family-courts-sir-james-munby-domestic-abuse-victims\" data-link-name=\"in body link\">end to the cross-examination of domestic violence victims by alleged perpetrators<\/a> in court hearings, a practice banned in the criminal court. He said there needed to be \u201cdecisive action to cure this deeply unsatisfactory situation\u201d.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/aside>\n<p>Cobb\u2019s reforms were endorsed on Friday by the President of the family division, Sir James Munby, who praised both Women\u2019s Aid and the \u201chard hitting articles in the Guardian\u201d for highlighting the issues.<\/p>\n<p>The changes are contained in amendments to judicial guidance known as practice direction 12J. A key change announced by Cobb was that the presumption in the family court that there should be \u201ccontact at all costs\u201d with both parents would be scrapped. He said it should be excluded in domestic violence cases where involvement of a parent in a child\u2019s life would place the child or other parent at risk of harm.<\/p>\n<p>He also said judges needed to be more alert to perpetrators of domestic violence using the courts as a way to continue their abuse. \u201cFamily court judges should be sure that they understand the new offence of coercion [controlling or coercive behaviour in an intimate or family relationship],\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>Cobb called for judges to be more alert to how violent men could use the access within the courts to assault their former partners, putting forward a proposal for courts to consider more carefully the waiting arrangements before a hearing, and arrangements for entering and exiting the court building.<\/p>\n<p>The Ministry of Justice has indicated \u2013 following the articles in the Guardian and questions in parliament \u2013 that it is going to change the law to <a class=\"u-underline\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/society\/2017\/jan\/04\/truss-orders-review-to-ban-abusers-tormenting-victims-in-family-courts\" data-link-name=\"in body link\">enforce a ban on direct cross-examination<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"byline\" data-link-name=\"byline\" data-component=\"meta-byline\">By <a class=\"tone-colour\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/profile\/sandralaville\" rel=\"author\" data-link-name=\"auto tag link\">Sandra Laville<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Source for full article\u00a0 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/society\/2017\/jan\/20\/uk-judges-change-court-rules-on-child-contact-for-violent-fathers-domestic-abuse?CMP=fb_gu\" target=\"_blank\">www.theguardian.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"mh-excerpt\">Senior judges are taking steps to end the presumption that a father must have contact with a child where there is evidence of domestic abuse that would put the child or mother at risk. The <a class=\"mh-excerpt-more\" href=\"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/2017\/01\/22\/uk-judges-change-court-rules-child-contact-violent-fathers\/\" title=\"UK judges change court rules on child contact for violent fathers\">[&#8230;]<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":5227,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2,4],"tags":[993,2673],"class_list":{"0":"post-5226","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-news","8":"category-uk","9":"tag-domestic-violence","10":"tag-family-law","11":"pmpro-has-access"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5226","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5226"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5226\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5231,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5226\/revisions\/5231"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5227"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5226"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5226"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5226"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}