{"id":29610,"date":"2025-07-09T05:05:12","date_gmt":"2025-07-09T09:05:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/?p=29610"},"modified":"2025-07-09T05:05:12","modified_gmt":"2025-07-09T09:05:12","slug":"jury-free-trials-recommended-to-save-courts-from-collapse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/2025\/07\/09\/jury-free-trials-recommended-to-save-courts-from-collapse\/","title":{"rendered":"Jury-free trials recommended to save courts from ‘collapse’"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Thousands of cases that would normally be heard in front of a jury should be decided by judges alone, according to recommendations made by a former senior judge.<\/b><\/p>\n

Sir Brian Leveson was asked by the Lord Chancellor to come up with a series of proposals to reduce the backlog of cases in the criminal courts.<\/p>\n

There are almost 77,000 cases waiting for trial in the Crown Court in England and Wales – meaning some defendants and victims are waiting years for justice.<\/p>\n

After reviewing the state of the criminal courts, Sir Brian suggested “fundamental” reforms to “reduce the risk of total system collapse”. But some barristers argue juries are essential for fair justice – and scrapping them is wrong.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

To fix what he calls a broken system, Sir Brian has suggested having judge-only trials for certain cases such as fraud and bribery.<\/p>\n

Another recommendation involves having more out of court resolutions like cautions.<\/p>\n

He wants a new division of the Crown Court with two magistrates and a judge to handle less serious offences, and to increase the number of sentence reductions for guilty pleas at the first opportunity offered.<\/p>\n

This is all about shortening the process in the hope of cutting the big backlog.<\/p>\n

“Our criminal justice system stands at a critical juncture,” said\u00a0Sir Brian who was requested to look into the matter in December<\/a>\u00a0last year.<\/p>\n

Challenged on BBC Breakfast whether the right to a jury trial in the UK was a basic right, Sir Brian said: “You say it’s a basic right – your right is your right to a fair trial.<\/p>\n

“One of the consequences of the delay is victims, witnesses and indeed defendants are kept waiting for years and years and can’t move on with their lives. Something has got to be done to try and address that.<\/p>\n

“If we don’t do something very dramatic, these cases will get longer and longer delayed.”<\/p>\n

Sir Brian added: “These are not small tweaks but fundamental changes that will seek to make the system fit for the 21st century.”<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

The proposals would mean more cases will be heard in the magistrates’ courts, with jury trials reserved for the most serious cases.<\/p>\n

Either-way offences – those which can be heard in a Crown Court or a magistrates court – with a maximum custodial sentence of two years or less, such as possession of drugs, bike theft and voyeurism, could face lower penalties of 12 months imprisonment or less.<\/p>\n

Defendants in cases for offences including assault of an emergency worker, stalking and possessing an indecent photograph of a child would also no longer be able to choose a jury trial.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

‘Radical change’<\/span><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Not all lawyers agree with the suggested changes, however.<\/p>\n

And in response, Mary Prior KC, chair of the Criminal Bar Association, said: “Any fundamental change is going to require the criminal barristers who prosecute and defend in the Crown Court to believe that this is the best way forward.<\/p>\n

“As this is such a radical change to the criminal justice system we will be listening to what our members say. There is a lot to digest.”<\/p>\n

Manisha Knights, Solicitor Advocate with MK Law, said: “Our jury system is central and pivotal to our justice system.<\/p>\n

“With juries comes diversity whereas the judiciary still very much lacks it. The right to be tried by one’s peers should not be removed or be diluted in any way, shape or form.”<\/p>\n

The English and Welsh legal system is widely regarded as one of the best and most independent in the world, with\u00a0the first known English jury trial dating from the 1200s.<\/a><\/p>\n

Not all countries commonly use juries, however – for example Germany has no juries while France reserves them for the most serious cases.<\/p>\n

Non-jury trials have been used in Northern Ireland since 1973 to prevent jury intimidation or bias in terrorism prosecutions.<\/p>\n

At the height of the Troubles, more than 300 cases a year were tried by a judge sitting alone but in 2023 there were just 12 non-jury trials.<\/p>\n

Legislation allowing their use must be renewed every two years by Parliament.<\/p>\n

The Magistrates’ Association welcomed the review, saying it will speed up justice for thousands.<\/p>\n

“Magistrates are ready and willing to support these and other initiatives aimed at reducing the pressure on Crown Courts,” said Mark Beattie, national chair of the Magistrates’ Association.<\/p>\n

“We urge the government to implement Leveson’s recommendations as soon as possible. Every day that they aren’t in place, is a day when victims, witnesses and defendants have to wait for justice.”<\/p>\n

Met Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley said: “As Sir Brian rightly identifies, criminal justice in this country runs the risk of ‘total system collapse’ unless we take the radical steps needed to reverse years of decline.<\/p>\n

“It cannot be right that in London more than 100 trials listed are for 2029. This is intolerable for victims and all parties who rely on a properly functioning court system to provide closure from what are often traumatic experiences, made worse by persistent delays.”<\/p>\n

He added: “I welcome this report and look forward to working with partners across government to deliver the bold reforms that are now a necessity, not an option.”<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Among the recommendations are:<\/b><\/p>\n

\n