![\"Meng](\"https:\/\/ichef.bbci.co.uk\/news\/624\/cpsprodpb\/4FF7\/production\/_112517402_hi061578069.jpg\")
<\/span><\/h2>\nHow have they been treated?<\/h2>\n
Michael Kovrig’s employer, the Crisis Group think tank, says on its website that he has not seen a lawyer or his family since the detention, and that he only has “periodic consular visits”.<\/p>\n
“Michael’s work has included meeting…Chinese officials, academics and analysts from multiple Chinese state institutions,”\u00a0the Crisis Group said.<\/a><\/p>\n “He has attended numerous conferences at the invitation of Chinese organisations. He frequently appears on Chinese television and in other media to comment on regional issues.<\/p>\n “Nothing Michael does has harmed China.”<\/p>\n The\u00a0Free Michael Spavor<\/a>\u00a0website, updated earlier this year, said he was “behind bars, without his family, and without access to lawyers”.<\/p>\n “Michael is an earnest, genuine, and impossibly fun person, who we believe has been detained in error,” the website says.<\/p>\n In April 2019,\u00a0it was reported<\/a>\u00a0that both men were being interrogated for between six to eight hours a day, and were sometimes subject to 24-hour artificial lighting.<\/p>\n The Chinese government says the men are in “good health”.<\/p>\n Last month, a Canadian court ruled that her case could go forward.<\/p>\n A judge found the case met the threshold of double criminality – meaning the charges would be crimes in both the US and Canada.<\/p>\n Her lead defence lawyer, Richard Peck, argued that Canada was effectively being asked “to enforce US sanctions”.<\/p>\n A year after her arrest, Ms Weng\u00a0released an open letter<\/a>, detailing her life in detention at her home in Vancouver.<\/p>\n “Over the past year, I have learned to face up to and accept my situation,” she said. “I’m no longer afraid of the unknown.”<\/p>\n She also said she finally had time to “read a book cover to cover,” or “carefully complete an oil painting”.<\/p>\n Though the Chinese government has not absolutely, explicitly linked the cases of Michael Spavor and Michael Kovrig with Meng Wanzhou’s extradition proceedings in Vancouver, it has certainly given large dollops of nudge, nudge, wink, wink references making this connection.<\/p>\n At the foreign ministry’s regular press briefings, the various spokespeople routinely mention the fate of the Canadians and that of the daughter of Huawei’s founder in the same response, whether they’ve been prompted to do so or not by reporters.<\/p>\n The Communist Party’s media outlets have been more specific. Canada: if you want this former diplomat and businessman back, you know what you have to do\u2026 release Meng Wanzhou.<\/p>\n The problem, of course, is that in Canada, there is a separation of powers and an extradition treaty with the United States.<\/p>\n Even if the Canadian government thought there was a political element to the extradition request it received from Washington, it’s a matter for the courts there to decide whether her alleged activities might potentially constitute a crime in both jurisdictions – and they’ve decided yes, so the matter will proceed.<\/p>\n No such separation of powers headache in China, though. The courts here are completely controlled by the Communist Party and prosecutors enjoy a 99% success rate.<\/p>\n Source: bbc.co.uk<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"What is the latest with Meng Wanzhou?<\/h2>\n
\n
China’s heavy hints over Meng Wanzhou case<\/h2>\n
![\"Analysis](\"https:\/\/ichef.bbci.co.uk\/news\/624\/cpsprodpb\/15E13\/production\/_110891698_stephenmcdonell-nc.png\")
<\/span><\/figure>\n