{"id":16476,"date":"2020-01-31T04:36:10","date_gmt":"2020-01-31T09:36:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/?p=16476"},"modified":"2020-01-31T04:36:10","modified_gmt":"2020-01-31T09:36:10","slug":"facebook-settles-facial-recognition-dispute","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/2020\/01\/31\/facebook-settles-facial-recognition-dispute\/","title":{"rendered":"Facebook settles facial recognition dispute"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"story-body__introduction\">Facebook has settled a long-running legal dispute about the way it scans and tags people&#8217;s photos.<\/p>\n<p>It will pay $550m (\u00a3421m) to a group of users in Illinois, who argued that its facial recognition tool was in violation of the state&#8217;s privacy laws.<\/p>\n<p>The case has been ongoing since 2015, and the settlement was announced in its quarterly earnings.<\/p>\n<p>It comes as facial recognition use by the police, and in public spaces, comes under intense scrutiny.<\/p>\n<p>The lawsuit against Facebook was given the go-ahead in 2018 when a federal judge ruled it could be heard as a class action (group) case. The appeals court disagreed with Facebook&#8217;s attempts to stop this, and in January the Supreme Court also declined to review its appeal.<\/p>\n<p>The social network told the BBC: &#8220;We decided to pursue a settlement as it was in the best interests of our community and our shareholders to move past this matter.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Facebook began using facial recognition in the US in 2010 when it automatically tagged people in photos using its tag suggestions tool. The tool scan a user&#8217;s face and offered suggestions about who that person is.<\/p>\n<p>The technology proved controversial at the time. Although users had the option to switch it off, they were not explicitly asked if they had wanted it activated.<\/p>\n<p>In December 2017 the setting was renamed face recognition and people were able to more easily switch it on or off.\u00a0<a class=\"story-body__link-external\" href=\"https:\/\/about.fb.com\/news\/2019\/09\/update-face-recognition\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">And in 2019, Facebook made the feature opt-in<\/a>\u00a0as part of its new drive to become more privacy-focused.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This settlement represents the second major settlement from Facebook in six months. Protecting people&#8217;s information and privacy has become a top priority for it and it has more than 1,000 engineers working on privacy-related projects,&#8221; said Christopher Rossbach, of investment bank J Stern &amp; Co.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"story-body__crosshead\">&#8216;Pause&#8217; on use<\/h2>\n<p>Live facial recognition systems are now being adopted across society, but questions remain about how useful such tools are in recognising faces.<\/p>\n<p>Some cities across the US have banned their use in police body cameras.<\/p>\n<p>In January, the European Union also said it was considering putting a pause on the use of the tech in public, as regulators worked out how to prevent it being abused.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, the Chinese government has started rolling out facial recognition in pharmacies in Shanghai. It is for people buying certain drugs, as part of a drive to crack down on the resale of controlled substances and the reuse of certain ingredients in medicines in illegal drugs.<\/p>\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/news\/technology-51309186\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">bbc.co.uk<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"mh-excerpt\">Facebook has settled a long-running legal dispute about the way it scans and tags people&#8217;s photos. It will pay $550m (\u00a3421m) to a group of users in Illinois, who argued that its facial recognition tool <a class=\"mh-excerpt-more\" href=\"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/2020\/01\/31\/facebook-settles-facial-recognition-dispute\/\" title=\"Facebook settles facial recognition dispute\">[&#8230;]<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":16477,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2,3],"tags":[6944,335,873,3961,2701],"class_list":{"0":"post-16476","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-news","8":"category-usa","9":"tag-biometrics","10":"tag-facebook","11":"tag-facial-recognition","12":"tag-illinois","13":"tag-privacy","14":"pmpro-has-access"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16476","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16476"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16476\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16478,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16476\/revisions\/16478"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/16477"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16476"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16476"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16476"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}