{"id":1561,"date":"2016-10-24T06:37:30","date_gmt":"2016-10-24T10:37:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/?p=1561"},"modified":"2016-10-24T06:37:30","modified_gmt":"2016-10-24T10:37:30","slug":"artificially-intelligent-judge-predicts-case-outcomes-in-the-european-court-of-human-rights","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/2016\/10\/24\/artificially-intelligent-judge-predicts-case-outcomes-in-the-european-court-of-human-rights\/","title":{"rendered":"Artificially Intelligent Judge Predicts Case Outcomes in the European Court of Human Rights."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Researchers loaded\u00a0the text of 584 past cases to see if a computer could predict the outcomes. \u00a0In cases covering areas of law including torture, privacy and degrading treatment, the artificial intelligence (AI) judge reached the same verdicts as the judges did in the cases &#8211; with 79% accuracy.<\/p>\n<p>Dr Nikolaos Aletras, who led the study, said,\u00a0\u201cWe don\u2019t see AI replacing judges or lawyers, but we think they\u2019d find it useful for rapidly identifying patterns in cases that lead to certain outcomes. \u00a0It could also be a valuable tool for highlighting which cases are most likely to be violations of the European Convention on Human Rights.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"mh-excerpt\">Researchers loaded\u00a0the text of 584 past cases to see if a computer could predict the outcomes. \u00a0In cases covering areas of law including torture, privacy and degrading treatment, the artificial intelligence (AI) judge reached the <a class=\"mh-excerpt-more\" href=\"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/2016\/10\/24\/artificially-intelligent-judge-predicts-case-outcomes-in-the-european-court-of-human-rights\/\" title=\"Artificially Intelligent Judge Predicts Case Outcomes in the European Court of Human Rights.\">[&#8230;]<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1565,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[15,2],"tags":[1029,1028,1031,1030,1032],"class_list":{"0":"post-1561","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-human-rights","8":"category-news","9":"tag-ai","10":"tag-artificial-intelligence","11":"tag-artificially-intelligent-judge","12":"tag-european-convention-on-human-rights","13":"tag-same-verdicts","14":"pmpro-has-access"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1561","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1561"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1561\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1564,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1561\/revisions\/1564"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1565"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1561"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1561"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1561"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}