{"id":12668,"date":"2018-10-08T07:36:04","date_gmt":"2018-10-08T11:36:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/?p=12668"},"modified":"2018-10-08T07:36:04","modified_gmt":"2018-10-08T11:36:04","slug":"google-iphone-data-privacy-case-blocked-by-high-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/2018\/10\/08\/google-iphone-data-privacy-case-blocked-by-high-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Google iPhone data privacy case blocked by High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"story-body__introduction\">The High Court has blocked a bid to sue Google for allegedly unlawfully taking data from 4.4 million UK iPhone users.<\/p>\n<p>The legal case was mounted by a group called Google You Owe Us, led by former Which director Richard Lloyd.<\/p>\n<p>It sought compensation for people whose handsets were tracked by Google for several months in 2011 and 2012.<\/p>\n<p>Mr Lloyd said he was &#8220;disappointed&#8221; by the ruling and his group would appeal, but Google said it was &#8220;pleased&#8221; and thought the case was &#8220;without merit&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>The campaign was believed to be the first mass legal action of its kind in the UK.<\/p>\n<p>Mr Justice Warby who oversaw the case explained that it was blocked because the claims that people suffered damage were not supported by the facts advanced by the campaign group.<\/p>\n<p>Another reason for blocking it, he said, was the impossibility of reliably calculating the number of iPhone users affected by the alleged privacy breach.<\/p>\n<p>Mr Lloyd said in a statement: &#8220;Today&#8217;s judgement is extremely disappointing and effectively leaves millions of people without any practical way to seek redress and compensation when their personal data has been misused.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>He added that he would seek permission to appeal against the verdict on behalf of the 20,000 people who signed up to the campaign.<\/p>\n<p>In response to the court ruling, Google said: &#8220;&#8221;The privacy and security of our users is extremely important to us. This claim is without merit, and we&#8217;re pleased the court has dismissed it.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The case revolved around how Google used what are known as cookies &#8211; small computer text files that log information as people browse the web and use online services.<\/p>\n<p>The complaint made by Google You Owe Us alleged that the cookies were used by Google to track people and get around settings on Apple&#8217;s Safari browser that blocked such monitoring.<\/p>\n<p>Ads were sold on the basis of the personal information gathered by Google&#8217;s cookies.<\/p>\n<p>The Safari workaround was used by Google on lots of different devices but the UK case centred on iPhone users. The group hoped to win \u00a31bn ($1.3bn) in compensation for affected users.<\/p>\n<p>The first stage of the legal case was getting the UK courts to recognise that the group had a legitimate complaint.<\/p>\n<p>In an earlier court appearance, Google argued that the type of action being brought by Mr Lloyd was unsuitable and should not be given the go-ahead.<\/p>\n<p>Google has paid $39.5m in the US to settle earlier claims against it over similar data-gathering claims.<\/p>\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/news\/technology-45784852\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">bbc.co.uk<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"mh-excerpt\">The High Court has blocked a bid to sue Google for allegedly unlawfully taking data from 4.4 million UK iPhone users. The legal case was mounted by a group called Google You Owe Us, led <a class=\"mh-excerpt-more\" href=\"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/2018\/10\/08\/google-iphone-data-privacy-case-blocked-by-high-court\/\" title=\"Google iPhone data privacy case blocked by High Court\">[&#8230;]<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":12669,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2,4],"tags":[2131,592,411],"class_list":{"0":"post-12668","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-news","8":"category-uk","9":"tag-google","10":"tag-high-court","11":"tag-iphone","12":"pmpro-has-access"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12668","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12668"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12668\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12670,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12668\/revisions\/12670"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12669"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12668"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12668"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12668"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}