{"id":11836,"date":"2018-07-25T07:22:36","date_gmt":"2018-07-25T11:22:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/?p=11836"},"modified":"2018-07-25T07:22:36","modified_gmt":"2018-07-25T11:22:36","slug":"kit-kat-case-no-break-for-nestle-in-trademark-row","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/2018\/07\/25\/kit-kat-case-no-break-for-nestle-in-trademark-row\/","title":{"rendered":"Kit Kat case: No break for Nestl\u00e9 in trademark row"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"story-body__introduction\">Even if it looks like a Kit Kat, it might not be.<\/p>\n<p>The European Court of Justice has thrown out an appeal by the chocolate bar&#8217;s maker, Nestl\u00e9, which argued that it owns the shape of the teatime treat.<\/p>\n<p>Nestl\u00e9 has spent more than a decade fighting to trademark the four-fingered wafer shape &#8211; something that rival Cadbury had fought hard against.<\/p>\n<p>But Wednesday&#8217;s judgement found that a previous court had been right to annul the decision by Europe&#8217;s trademark group.<\/p>\n<p>That could bring an end to the snack&#8217;s protected European status &#8211; and a saga that has proved expensive for both sides.<\/p>\n<p>It also takes the pressure off identical treats like Norway&#8217;s Kvikk Lunsj &#8211; pronounced &#8220;quick lunch&#8221; and which has been around for 80 years &#8211; and opens the door to own-brand imitations at your local supermarket.<\/p>\n<p>British and US readers may not even have heard of Kvikk Lunsj.<\/p>\n<p>Norwegians, though, have national pride in the snack, and its long-running image as a meal on the go for healthy Scandinavian hikers.<\/p>\n<p>Its chocolate has a different flavour from the Kit Kat, similar to parent company Mondelez&#8217;s Milka brand. Taste-testing from\u00a0<a class=\"story-body__link-external\" href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/lifeandstyle\/shortcuts\/2017\/may\/19\/kitkat-v-kvikk-lunsj-which-four-fingered-chocolate-bar-tastes-best\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the Guardian newspaper last year concluded that Kvikk Lunsj was, in fact, the superior product<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The Norwegian bar has been made since 1937, a mere two years after Kit Kat &#8211; originally called Rowntree&#8217;s chocolate crisp &#8211; hit the market in 1935.<\/p>\n<p>For 65 years, the two crispy treats lived together in harmony &#8211; until Nestl\u00e9 went on the offensive.<\/p>\n<p>In 2002, the global chocolate giant applied for a trademark in Europe for Kit Kat. There was no issue with the bar itself, embossed with the Kit Kat logo.<\/p>\n<p>But it also applied for the trademark for the shape of a Kit Kat &#8211; or &#8220;four trapezoidal bars aligned on a rectangular base&#8221; as a top EU legal adviser put it.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"media-landscape has-caption full-width\"><span class=\"image-and-copyright-container\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"responsive-image__img js-image-replace\" src=\"https:\/\/ichef.bbci.co.uk\/news\/624\/cpsprodpb\/1326F\/production\/_102674487_1d481d61-d8d5-4233-8307-5440a28d04d8.jpg\" alt=\"A composite image shows a black and white graphic of a KitKat shape, left, next to a real photographed Kit Kat, right\" width=\"976\" height=\"302\" data-highest-encountered-width=\"624\" \/><\/span><figcaption class=\"media-caption\"><span class=\"media-caption__text\">A real Kit Kat has logos &#8211; but what about the shape on the left, from Nestl\u00e9&#8217;s application? (Image:\u00a0<span class=\"image-and-copyright-container\"><span class=\"story-image-copyright\">EUOIP)<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>After four years of back-and-forth, the EU trademark granted Nestl\u00e9 the shape as a trademark.<\/p>\n<p>The makers of Kvikk Lunsj, Mondelez, also owns brands including Cadbury, Milka, Oreo, and Toblerone &#8211; and Cadbury took issue with Nestl\u00e9&#8217;s new trademark.<\/p>\n<p>Mondelez also makes the Leo bar &#8211; another four-fingered chocolate treat.<\/p>\n<p>In 2007, the court battle began in earnest, see-sawing from one side to the other during appeal after appeal.<\/p>\n<p>Wednesday&#8217;s ruling threw out Nestl\u00e9&#8217;s appeal, telling the EU trademark office it has to &#8220;reconsider&#8221; its decision &#8211; essentially annulling Kit Kat&#8217;s claim.<\/p>\n<p>The case was about whether the brand had become distinctive enough to deserve its trademark &#8211; that its shape alone was how people recognise the snack.<\/p>\n<p>In 2016, a lower EU court decided that Nestl\u00e9 had to prove a Kit Kat was recognisable in every EU country &#8211; and no evidence had been provided for Belgium, Ireland, Greece and Portugal.<\/p>\n<p>And none of the parties involved &#8211; Mondelez, Nestl\u00e9, or the European trademark office &#8211; were happy about that.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"media-landscape has-caption full-width\"><span class=\"image-and-copyright-container\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"responsive-image__img js-image-replace\" src=\"https:\/\/ichef.bbci.co.uk\/news\/624\/cpsprodpb\/1597F\/production\/_102674488_4671b0fb-9187-46eb-a58a-a6603b7a8448.jpg\" alt=\"A Kvikk Lunsj chocolate bar is perched atop a Kit Kat in this photo\" width=\"976\" height=\"549\" data-highest-encountered-width=\"624\" \/><\/span><figcaption class=\"media-caption\"><span class=\"media-caption__text\">Nothing in common on the wrapper &#8211; it&#8217;s what&#8217;s inside that counts<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Nestl\u00e9 and the EU&#8217;s trademark office appealed against the 2016 decision. If proof of distinctiveness had to be shown for every single member state, they argued, no company could ever reach that high standard.<\/p>\n<p>Mondelez, meanwhile, argued that it was wrong to conclude that Kit Kat had &#8220;distinctive character&#8221; anywhere &#8211; including countries like the UK, Germany and France.<\/p>\n<p>The European court threw out all those objections.<\/p>\n<p>The result is that the EU&#8217;s top court has now declared that it&#8217;s not enough to prove that a product has become iconic in &#8220;a significant part&#8221; of the EU &#8211; it has to be proven across all the markets of the bloc, not just some.<\/p>\n<p>So the Kit Kat is set to lose its EU trademark. But there is still a fight to be fought on a national scale.<\/p>\n<p>European status aside, chocolate is serious business for trademark lawyers on a country-by-country basis.<\/p>\n<p>Nestl\u00e9 had been looking for Europe-wide protection for the Kit Kat shape, but there has also been an almost identical case in the UK.<\/p>\n<p>That ended in a 16,000-word ruling that Kit Kat had &#8220;no inherent distinctiveness&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Cadbury, meanwhile, lost its own trademark battle when it tried to register a shade of purple.<\/p>\n<p>And, back in 2006, a case involving gold chocolate bunnies asked similar questions to the Kit Kat saga.<\/p>\n<p>Swiss chocolatier Lindt applied for a trademark for its Easter bunnies with a red ribbon, which are iconic in many countries &#8211; but not all.<\/p>\n<p>In Germany, the Riegelein company also made gold-wrapped bunnies, and the case made it to both European and German courts &#8211; where Lindt eventually lost.<\/p>\n<p>And while Mondelez won the argument that you can&#8217;t trademark the shape of a Kit Kat, it&#8217;s sure you can trademark a Toblerone &#8211; which it owns.<\/p>\n<p>Toblerone&#8217;s shape was registered in 1998 &#8211; but was only put to the test last year, when British retailer Poundland designed an off-brand version.<\/p>\n<p>Featuring two rows of triangular bumps rather than one, Poundland argued that its copycat wasn&#8217;t a trademark infringement &#8211; especially since Toblerone had changed the shape of their UK product to reduce weight.<\/p>\n<p>That disagreement was settled out of court.<\/p>\n<p>Source: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/news\/world-europe-44939819\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">bbc.co.uk<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"mh-excerpt\">Even if it looks like a Kit Kat, it might not be. The European Court of Justice has thrown out an appeal by the chocolate bar&#8217;s maker, Nestl\u00e9, which argued that it owns the shape <a class=\"mh-excerpt-more\" href=\"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/2018\/07\/25\/kit-kat-case-no-break-for-nestle-in-trademark-row\/\" title=\"Kit Kat case: No break for Nestl\u00e9 in trademark row\">[&#8230;]<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":11837,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[109,2,6],"tags":[2422,5299,5300,5301,4033],"class_list":{"0":"post-11836","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-headline","8":"category-news","9":"category-world","10":"tag-european-court-of-justice","11":"tag-kit-kat","12":"tag-kvikk-lunsj","13":"tag-nestle","14":"tag-trademark","15":"pmpro-has-access"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11836","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11836"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11836\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11838,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11836\/revisions\/11838"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11837"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11836"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11836"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldjusticenews.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11836"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}